Navigation
News
Maricopa360.com Community News
Local Weather
Where's Desert Dweller?
Maricopa360.com Community Forum -- 07 February 2012, 04:53:05
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Rollover accident with fatality: I-10 / Wild Horse Pass Rd.  (Read 3902 times)
<3 Amber <3
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2,083



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #15 on: 01 September 2010, 21:35:26 »

not to downplay wearing a seat belt, but I knew someone who was killed by the seat belt.
He was a back seat passenger in a 4 door sedan that hit one of those big, thick stop light poles at a rate of speed a little above the average speed limit. When car met pole, force of impact sent him flying forward so quickly and forcefully that seat belt  nearly decapitated him...he did die, but at least his head was still 1/4 of the way attached when rescue crews got there. They could've found just his head ejected from the car instead of his entire body....just sayin'
Logged
Sam
Administrator
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,987



View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: 01 September 2010, 21:48:54 »

That happens sometimes.  There have been people who have lived through accidents because they were ejected from the vehicle, which then caught fire and burned to death all those who were stuck inside by their seatbelts.

Seatbelts are no guarantee.  More people have been saved by them than killed by them, however, so the odds are in their favor.
Logged

Maricopa360.com - Local News & Views
On Facebook: www.facebook.com/Maricopa360
On Twitter: Follow Maricopa360
mallardisme
Administrator
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5,564



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: 01 September 2010, 21:50:28 »

Tis true. Once in a blue moon it can cause the issue.
The statistics are very well lopsided to this line of thought, though. In 4 years, an esitmated 75,000 lives were saved due to seatbelt use.

I would not bet my life, or that of my familiy on a 1 in a million anomaly.

Here are some stats: http://is.gd/eQqgK (Source National Highway Traffic Safety Admistration)

Or here: http://is.gd/eQqQ5 (Source National Safety Council)

Seat belts save lives. While seat belt use has been increasing and averages 88 percent nationally, there are still groups less likely to wear seat belts:  teens, commercial drivers, males in rural areas, pick-up truck drivers, people driving at night, and people who have been drinking. Resources here include data, effective prevention, and links to national and state organizations working on this issue.
 
 
Seat Belts: Your Single Most Effective Safety Step

Seat belts are the single most effective traffic safety device for preventing death and injury, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Wearing a seat belt can reduce the risk of crash injuries by 50 percent. They save lives:

•Seat belts saved more than 75,000 lives from 2004 to 2008.
•Forty-two percent of passenger vehicle occupants killed in 2007 were unbelted. A 2009 NHTSA study estimates more than 1,600 lives could be saved and 22,000 injuries prevented if seat belt use was 90 percent in every state.
Logged

A photographic journal of Maricopa: http://www.newsofmaricopa.com
<3 Amber <3
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2,083



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #18 on: 01 September 2010, 22:09:57 »

I do not dispute the stats and facts and absolutely agree that it is lopsided.
I would never tell someone else to NOT wear their seat belts (and most definitely do and will always force my kids to do it...although they never object..lol).
As far as I'M concerned, it's a gamble either way f you're involved in an accident. It could save your life, it couldn't. It could kill you, it couldn't. I guess I just think when it's your time, it's your time.

The odds of people winning the state lottery are HORRIBLE, yet people still play. And yes, while VERY different outcomes, still the same odds.

The thing that really bothers me about seat belts is that it's law. Not wearing a seat belt is a "victimless crime". Well, unless you consider yourself a victim of your own decisions in the case that you die from not wearing one.  I get a little irritated knowing that i don't even have the right to choose whether I want to die from the possibility of being ejected from the vehicle or die from possibly being decapitated by the seat belt. I just think I should have the right to chose since it harms no one else.
And, crazy that motorcycle helmet is not LAW but a seat belt in a car is. Someone not wearing a helmet in an accident is WAYYY more likely to die than someone not wearing a seat belt.

**disclaimer** I do not in any way, shape, or form, suggest or condone someone NOT wearing a seat belt OR a motorcycle helmet (if riding a motorcycle)...just playing devil's advocate
Logged
Desert Dweller
Administrator
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4,200


Stupid Should Hurt.


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: 01 September 2010, 22:12:21 »

Duct tape begins where seat belts end.
Logged

         w6sdm.net  
Sam
Administrator
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,987



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: 01 September 2010, 22:29:28 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!
Logged

Maricopa360.com - Local News & Views
On Facebook: www.facebook.com/Maricopa360
On Twitter: Follow Maricopa360
Hello
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 340



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #21 on: 01 September 2010, 22:36:36 »

Everyone should always have the seat belt on.  Physics is no lie.  You need to stay as close to the speed as possible to the speed you are moving with.  No belt no control.  

As far as if it's your choice or not depends on how you look at it.  Leave it off, someone will pay for your choice, leave it on better chance someone will NOT pay for your choice.  

Keep it on...
Logged

How can you not believe in the one that gave you the option not to?
Tempting Fait
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2,279



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #22 on: 01 September 2010, 22:38:30 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!
Problem with that is the innocents that are hurt, wives/husbands, kids and if it's a 2 car accident, no matter who's at fault the other driver has to live with the fact that someone else died when they were driving.
Logged

The world would be a nicer place if everyone took a chill pill.

It would get even better is some just choked on it.
-
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2,455


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #23 on: 01 September 2010, 22:44:48 »

Everyone should always have the seat belt on.  Physics is no lie.  You need to stay as close to the speed as possible to the speed you are moving with.  No belt no control.  

As far as if it's your choice or not depends on how you look at it.  Leave it off, someone will pay for your choice, leave it on better chance someone will NOT pay for your choice.  

Keep it on...

Sorry to say Amber, I totally agree with this statement.
Logged
Hello
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 340



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #24 on: 01 September 2010, 22:45:35 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!
Problem with that is the innocents that are hurt, wives/husbands, kids and if it's a 2 car accident, no matter who's at fault the other driver has to live with the fact that someone else died when they were driving.

Yes,  defensive driving is the best keep yourself away from other cars.  It is easier then you think.
Logged

How can you not believe in the one that gave you the option not to?
<3 Amber <3
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2,083



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #25 on: 01 September 2010, 22:55:19 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!

I am in 100% agreeance with Sam. Until someone is of legal age to make those kinds of decisions, it should be law. As an adult, I should be able to choose without government interference.

Sorry TF and Snooze, if we looked at everything like that, then no one would ever leave their houses...or even live. Just being alive means that someone innocent could witness something horrendous that will change you psychologically.
Me seeing someone who cannot swim, drown in a pool can damage me psychologically. Should the government be involved and make it law that people learn to swim, or wear life vests in their own back yard just in case they fall in? No, that's just absurd. If you're an adult, you use common sense, you don't need the government to do it for you. 

Like I said, I'm not saying don't, I'm just saying I SHOULD have the choice.

Logged
Hello
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 340



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #26 on: 01 September 2010, 22:57:38 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!

I am in 100% agreeance with Sam. Until someone is of legal age to make those kinds of decisions, it should be law. As an adult, I should be able to choose without government interference.

Sorry TF and Snooze, if we looked at everything like that, then no one would ever leave their houses...or even live. Just being alive means that someone innocent could witness something horrendous that will change you psychologically.
Me seeing someone who cannot swim, drown in a pool can damage me psychologically. Should the government be involved and make it law that people learn to swim, or wear life vests in their own back yard just in case they fall in? No, that's just absurd. If you're an adult, you use common sense, you don't need the government to do it for you. 

Like I said, I'm not saying don't, I'm just saying I SHOULD have the choice.



You do have the choice.  Not sure why you don't think you do?
Logged

How can you not believe in the one that gave you the option not to?
<3 Amber <3
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2,083



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #27 on: 01 September 2010, 23:00:05 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!

I am in 100% agreeance with Sam. Until someone is of legal age to make those kinds of decisions, it should be law. As an adult, I should be able to choose without government interference.

Sorry TF and Snooze, if we looked at everything like that, then no one would ever leave their houses...or even live. Just being alive means that someone innocent could witness something horrendous that will change you psychologically.
Me seeing someone who cannot swim, drown in a pool can damage me psychologically. Should the government be involved and make it law that people learn to swim, or wear life vests in their own back yard just in case they fall in? No, that's just absurd. If you're an adult, you use common sense, you don't need the government to do it for you. 

Like I said, I'm not saying don't, I'm just saying I SHOULD have the choice.



You do have the choice.  Not sure why you don't think you do?

I do NOT have a choice to wear the seat belt or not. The choice I DO have is to obey the law or not. I choose to obey the law...period.  Don't confuse the two choices.

So Snooze, you would not at all be offended if the government came into your house and made it MANDATORY for you, an adult who knows how to swim, to wear a life vest or floaties just to go into your own back yard? Screw getting into the pool...just to go out there?  Floaties or life vest could possibly save your life ya know...just in case.
Logged
Chunk
Technical Consultant
Sustaining Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5,292



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #28 on: 01 September 2010, 23:00:34 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!

I am in 100% agreeance with Sam. Until someone is of legal age to make those kinds of decisions, it should be law. As an adult, I should be able to choose without government interference.

Sorry TF and Snooze, if we looked at everything like that, then no one would ever leave their houses...or even live. Just being alive means that someone innocent could witness something horrendous that will change you psychologically.
Me seeing someone who cannot swim, drown in a pool can damage me psychologically. Should the government be involved and make it law that people learn to swim, or wear life vests in their own back yard just in case they fall in? No, that's just absurd. If you're an adult, you use common sense, you don't need the government to do it for you. 

Like I said, I'm not saying don't, I'm just saying I SHOULD have the choice.



I think its the governments job to help us and save us from ourselves.  If I could give most of my income back to the government so that they could grow and help me decide how to live my life I would.

Yeah that was sarcasm.  Yeah I just watched the debates and am making fun of Terry Goddard...
Logged
Hello
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 340



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #29 on: 01 September 2010, 23:02:47 »

I think it should be a law for children since there are too many bad parents out there, but for adults I think it should be a freedom of choice thing.  No matter what the stats say, if a grown adult wants to chance it, the government should not be trying to force it on them.  It's not the government's job to protect us from ourselves!

I am in 100% agreeance with Sam. Until someone is of legal age to make those kinds of decisions, it should be law. As an adult, I should be able to choose without government interference.

Sorry TF and Snooze, if we looked at everything like that, then no one would ever leave their houses...or even live. Just being alive means that someone innocent could witness something horrendous that will change you psychologically.
Me seeing someone who cannot swim, drown in a pool can damage me psychologically. Should the government be involved and make it law that people learn to swim, or wear life vests in their own back yard just in case they fall in? No, that's just absurd. If you're an adult, you use common sense, you don't need the government to do it for you. 

Like I said, I'm not saying don't, I'm just saying I SHOULD have the choice.



You do have the choice.  Not sure why you don't think you do?

I do NOT have a choice to wear the seat belt or not. The choice I DO have is to obey the law or not. I choose to obey the law...period.  Don't confuse the two choices.

So Snooze, you would not at all be offended if the government came into your house and made it MANDATORY for you, an adult who knows how to swim, to wear a life vest or floaties just to go into your own back yard? Screw getting into the pool...just to go out there?  Floaties or life vest could possibly save your life ya know...just in case.

I see the point you are making...You should not get a ticket because you do not have your belt on.

Logged

How can you not believe in the one that gave you the option not to?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
Print
 
Jump to:  

Copyright © 2009 Maricopa Media - All Rights Reserved --- Anone designed by pixelslot.
Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC